retiredprof.com
  • Home
  • Videos

Mir Hossein Moussavi.........Well-connected Insider.

6/19/2009

0 Comments

 

He was close to the founder of Iran's Islamic revolution Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, but has recently found himself at odds with the present Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, his brother-in law, having joined the group around former presidents Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami, who withdrew his candidacy for the presidency in his favour. This insider status would seem at odds to his being projected as someone who would challenge the core principles and institutions of the Islamic Republic. He was Prime Minister from 1981-89, after he had served as foreign minister and as editor of the official newspaper of the Islamic Republican Party, which he used to wage a relentless attack on the then President Banisadr, who fled into exile to France. His mentor, Ayatollah Khomeini, supervised his rapid rise to power, first appointing him to the Revolutionary Council, then as editor of the party newspaper, then Foreign Minister and in 1981 Prime Minister. He was labeled by the Reagan administration as the " most radical in the leadership"', for his policy of nationalization of foreign companies , his support of the " fatwa" issued against Salman Rushdie, accusing the West of " cultural conspiracy" and saying that "Iran's firm decision on( Rushdie) issue will ensure the country's independence and dignity". Also he was Prime Minister in 1988 when thousands were executed (according to Human Rights Watch). He was out of the political limelight for 20 years, only recently returned to challenge Ahmadinejad for the presidency as the candidate of the faction led by Rafsanjani.

      Ayatollah Ali Khameini, is the Supreme Ruler as head of the Guardian Council, of the Armed Forces and of the Revolutionary Guards. He has the final say on all matters of state and religion. He has accepted the result as a divine sanction and in a speech on Friday, reiterated this position very strongly, warning those who protest. In the meantime, Ahmadinejad has been in Russia getting the blessing of Iran's close ally and neighbor, meeting the Russian president. Ahmadinejad is the Ayatollah's choice and his support for him has not wavered so far. It will not waver, for to do so, is to be seen as a sign of weakness and a threat to his control. Rafsanjani, Khatami and Moussavi have been put on notice by the Ayatollah and it will be  their response that will determine whether there will be violence. Moussavi is no Gandhi or Mandela or Obama orAyatollah Khomeini, who famously stated that ' I will strike with my fists at the mouths of the government". Ten days later, Feb.11, 1979, the government collapsed. He lacks the charisma, and is described as having a " soporific speaking manner". He is however described as" resolute" and whose tenure as prime minister and his connection to the early days of the "revolution", supposedly, has given him experience and toughness. We are in for some interesting times. Can Mossavi lead? I think not.

      This a battle between Khameini and Rafsanjani, who is the head of the Assembly of Experts, who are responsible for selecting, supervising and removing the Supreme Leader. Rafsanjani is also in charge of the Expediency Council, which is responsible for mediating and resolving disputes between government bodies. Will they dare to take on the Supreme leader and his Revolutionary Guards and the Military? Student protests in 1999 and 2003 were harshly put down and let's not forget the thousands that were executed by the Moussavi government in 1988.

" Force is the mid-wife of every old society, pregnant with a new one" Karl Marx.

Is the old ready to give way to the young? Remember Tianamen?  In Iran, the force is in the hands of the "old"and unless there is wholesale desertion, and that is highly unlikely, the Supreme Leader and the Revolutionary Guard will prevail.

      It is the 24th, and the protest much to the chagrin of the West and especially CNN has petered out.This is not 1979, when the charismatic Khomenei, returned from exile to overthrow the corrupt Shah and his American and British masters. The former shoe salesman on the Via Veneto had been placed in power by the CIA and the British, who overthrew the newly eleced Mossadegh in 1953. Twenty-six years of terror and repression followed. Thousands were killed, imprisoned and exiled. It all came tumbling down in 1979, when the Ayatollah Khomenei, who had been exiled to Iraq and then France, tapped in to the discontent and using Islam as his banner seized power. The hapless Shah was abondoned by his 'friends' in the West, who would not even allow him the courtesy of an honourable exile. Iran was declared an Islamic Republic and has operated as such for the past 30 years. Islamic institutions were created and have become firmly entrenched. Moussavi, Rafsanjani, Khatamini and others became the builders. They established  a system that was answerable to the Supreme Leader (Khomenei and his successors) and his religious advisers. They established and gave unfettered powers to the Revolutionary Guards as the guardian of the New order.

      Now the Supreme Leader Khamenei  has spoken. The election result has been divinely sanctioned. The Revolutionary Guards are in the streets, and the 'basij' has been set loose on the discontented. Moussavi has whimpered into oblivion, and the "exiles" have been left to be "fill ins" for CNN and other media who were starved for "news, and "blood'", in the streets of Teheran. Israel is happy however. They need the 'bogeyman' Ahmadinejad, in power. They and their"amen" lobby in the USA can rant and rave about Iran's nuclear program under the "crazy" Ahmadinejad. This will not allow them to continue to imprison the West Bank and the Gaza and the people caught in the vicious spiral of hopelessness and misery, indefinitely . They may continue to steal land and build settlements, and grow vineyards, but their time is limited. Netanyahu and Leiberman will lose in the end.

      President Obama has acted with aplomb. He has resisted the urgings of the Republicans and the Conservative "loudmouths" to take a "tougher stand". Britain has become the Great Satan. Obama has not expended his capital. He has to deal with the Iranians, and he is not giving them an excuse to cop out.

'

 

      

0 Comments

Iran.....The Election is Over......Deal with it.

6/16/2009

1 Comment

 

      The election is over in Iran ,, but the result is disputed by the Moussavi and his distraught supporters. This was an election that pitted the younger middle and upper class voters in the capital Teheran against the rural poorer class who strongly identify with Ahmadinejad, who had done much to improve their conditions in his first term. Mir Hussein Moussavi, a prime minister in the 80's and the chisf challenger, had been out of the political spotlight for the past twenty years, and it was only after the Guardian Council approved the four candidates for the presidency, that the focus and the campaign for his election began. In the meantime, Ahmadinejad, not only was president for the past four years, but he had built a reputation as the defender of the Islamic Republic. His criticism of the United States (under Bush) and of Israel had won him a great following, and the pursuit of Iran's nuclear programme amidst the condemnation of the Western world had struck a nationalistic chord amongst the people. Ahmadinejad, also travelled all over the country, promising further economic support for the poor and vowing not to give up on Iran's nuclear programme, a source of great pride for Iranians. A poll conducted by the non-profit organisation, Terror Free Tomorrow:The Centre for Public Opinion and the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation, from May11 to 20, showed Ahmadinejad with a 2 to 1 lead. This is more than the announced result. In this poll Ahmadinejad was well ahead all of Iran's 30 provinces.

        Pre-election coverage by western media, especially CNN and the BBC, focused on the capital Teheran and the large crowd of Moussavi's supporters. They neglected to cover the provinces where Ahmadinejad was very popular. This gave a skewed view of the election and created the expectation of an upset. When this did not materialise, it was easy to shout "fraud', and because Ahmadinejad had been demonised in the western media coverage, it was easy to accept, too easy. It is true that the young and educated want more freedoms...to go on the inter-net, twitter, you-tube etc.They want to be free to dress and party etc. without the restrictions of the religious police. They are fooling themselves in thinking that a victory by Moussavi will get them these things. Who-ever is president is a puppet of the Guardian Council. He dares not go against the wishes or tyhe dictates of the Ayotallah Ali Khamenei, whose powers is unquestionable. 

      There is no doubt that Ahmadinejad won the election, and the result has been deemed as a "divine assessment", by the Ayotallah. That is it!

      The response from the American administration is muted. This is good. You do not want to further alienate the Ayotallah. You have to talk with his mouth-piece,Ahmadinejad. So let the talks proceed, on the nuclear programme and also on matters of Afghanistan and the drug trade pouring across the Iranian border with which the Iranians want American help; on the Palestinian issue and on Hizbollah and Hamas and on so many other issues that are important to both countries.  

          

 

  





1 Comment

The Stupids Are Here.

6/10/2009

0 Comments

 

      The Ref-Cons (notably Raitt and Baird) are running true to form and are joined by the Pequistes ( "call me Pauline"), and their Ottawa echo, the Blocquistes, the desperately benighted Mulcair of the N.D.P. and the disappearing Republicans and their "poseurs", Newt and Rush and Dick and more recently Jon " I am the father of Anjolie" Voigt.

      Lisa Raitt response to her aide, Jasmine MacDonnell's concern, that the isotope issue is hard to control was "But it is sexy.Radioactive leaks. Cancer" and when MacDonnell says " nuclear contamination", she said " but it's all about money". Raitt was more concerned with getting credit and questioning the competence of her colleague, the Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq. This is the same Raitt who left important and secret documents at an Ottawa TV studio, which led to MacDonnell being removed from her position. Now these new tapes were left in a Parliament Hill washroom and got into the hands of a reporter, Stephen Maher of the Halifax Chronicle Herald. Callousness, incompetence and base ambition at work. John Baird, the Transport minister was caught on tape telling Toronto, Canada's largest city to "F... OFF". The Ref-Cons are PANICKING.       

     The desperate and fading Pequistes and their leader Pauline Marois have come up with the half-baked idea of " piece by piece sovereignty". The plan is to get Ottawa to relinquish some of its powers voluntarily. Instead of waiting for a victory in a referendum, which will take place after the P.Q. wins an election, the party has decided on this,  " we are convinced we must leave behind this all-or-nothing approach in favour of one that is always seeking more for Quebeckers" said Marois breathlessly. They are stale and have nothing to offer but this jaded dream. First it was "sovereignty association" under Rene Levesque; then it was "sovereignty" under Jacques Parizeau; then it was "partenaire" under Lucien Bouchard; then back to "sovereignty"under Bernard Landry and now, its "trickle down sovereignty" under Pauline Marois. Rene, Jacques, Lucien and Bernard failed and so wiil this gambit by Pauline. In the meantime the Bloc Quebecois can do nothing but mouth the same thing. They are irrelevant but continue to delude themselves. Now the NDP and its Quebec voice, Mulcair have sided with the Bloc by voting to get the federal government to abondon what control it has over language of work in Quebec. Quebec's Charter of the French Language controls most aspect of workplace language but not those of the federal public service or crown corporations or industries regulated by federal labour law eg. banking and broadcasting. The NDP thinks it can make a break through amongst the French-speaking voters if they are seen as not just an Anglo mouthpiece. Votes before principles. Tommy Douglas and David Lewis must be having fits.

      On the American front, the "out of touch" and leaderless and "desperate to be seen as still a player" are resorting to their failed tactic of fear-mongering and name-calling. It has not work and will not work but will certainly quicken the demise of "this last bastion of aged and clueless white males". How desperate do you have to be to make "the Midnight Cowboy" your "poster-boy".    

       

0 Comments

The Obama Effect

6/9/2009

0 Comments

 

      He is cool and confident, polite and pointed, telegenic and temperate and America has lucked in when they elected him as president. At home and abroad, he continues to follow policies that build hopes. In The United States his economic policies are taking hold and slowly but surely, the tide is beginning to turn; in Lebanon the pro-American coalition has won the election, even though the "experts" had pojected that the Iranian/ Syrian backed Hezbollah coalition would win easily.....Obama's speech in Cairo, reaching out to Muslims has had a positive effect; in Israel the right-wing, settler- influenced Netanyahu's government have been denied the bogeyman of a Lebanon governed by Hezbollah......Netanyahu will not be able to shift the discussion away from the peace process with the Palestinians, and in Iran, the voters may be tiring of the anti-Americanism (it certainly has been blunted by Obama's reaching out), of Akmadinejad and turning to the moderation of his challenger, Mir Hussain Moussavi.

      The extremists fed off of Bush's belligerent and seemingly anti-Muslim rhetotric. That is in the past. This is a new beginning with Obama ,and the anti-American card is not as easy to play. The reaching out to the Muslim world will continue with talks with Syria and Iran....engagement rather than confrontation, and with the withdrawal from Iraq. The war in Pakistan and Afghanistan still pose a problem, but even Osama bin Ladin is losing his influence....he tried to hijack the stage from Obama but it was a failure and there was barely a ripple from his latest diatribe. You can expect bin Ladin and al Qaeda to lash out and try and regain the lost influence but like a dying animal thrashing about in its last throes, it will be short-lived.

          The Obama effect is taking hold and the world is a better place.

0 Comments

Obama....Play down, Play up.......Victory before Principle.

6/5/2009

0 Comments

 

      Barak Hussain Obama, came to Cairo and engaged the Muslim world. Less than six months ago, he was distancing himself from his Muslim forebears. He did so because an election had to be won. The Republicans were accusing him of being a Muslim and even Hillary was referring to him as BHO. His campaign, realised that if voters were convinced by these scurrilous attacks, the election would be lost. They decided to avoid any situation/ appearances that would give any credence to these accusations. Therefore he stayed away from Muslim-American functions and audiences, refusing even to send surrogates to events sponsored on his behalf by Muslim organisations. He accused the Republicans of "smear' and trying to discredit him by saying "maybe he's got Muslim connections.....Just making stuff up".

      Here is President Obama in Cairo, trying to convince his Muslim audiences that America is not an enemy of Islam. On this historic occasion, in the lion's den, he sought common ground between United States and the Islamic world, by using his personal history. He spoke of his Muslim family ties through his Kenyan, Muslim father and " generations of Muslims", of living in Indonesia and hearing the " call of the azaan" and of his pride when a Muslim was elected to Congress and using a Koran belonging to Thomas Jefferson to take the oath of office. '' I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed ", he said at Cairo University. " That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't'. This open embrace is already being hailed in the Muslim world, and has the potential to be a catalyst for change in relations. His message was that the United States and Islam "share common principles, principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings". It was a powerful message, and it must have been a surprise for Americans, especially Muslim Americans, as well as his audience in Egypt and eleswhere in the Muslim world.

      The speech was pointed and groundbreaking. He spoke to the fact that what is said in private must be said in public about Israel, the Palestinians, human rights, the conditrion of women, Iran and nuclear weapons, Iraq, Afghanistan and terrorism. Israel must stop its expansion into Palestinian territories and it must accept the two-state solution. The Palestinians must stop their violence against Israel and accept its right to exist. Human rights, women's rights and democracy must be instituted ( but America will not impose its principles). Iran must stop its nuclear weapons program. America will withdraw from Iraq and will not build bases their. Terrorism must be fought tirelessly and resolutely, until it is defeated. The war in Pakistan and Afdghanistan against al Qaeda and the Taliban will be pursued with full vigour and relentlessly

      Why did President Obama chose Cairo to deliver his message, this undemocratic, Muslim state with an aging autocratic ruler and little human rights? Less than 18% of the 1.5 billion Muslims live in the Middle East, where hatred of America is palpable, and where an entrenched elite rule with little real participation by the people. For just those reasons. Obama had to use this fulcrum, where, whatever happens influence the Muslim world. He had to deliver his message of reconcilation and cooperation, of respect and tolerance here or it would have been perceived as just another speech by an American president, more rhetoric than substance. He could have given the speech in his one-time home of Indonesia, with the largest Muslim population in the world and a burgeoning democracy, but that would have defeated the message and its purpose. He had to face this potentially hostile audience. He had to look them in the eyes and convince them that he was serious and that his message was real. 

      The message was succinct....clear and precise. The medium was engaging and accessible. The messenger was articulate, and his delivery resonated from Raleigh to Rabat to Riyadh to Rawalpindi. This was not Bush threatening fire and brimstone. This was an engaging and credible leader, who had given an interview to Arab television, who had visited Turkey, a majority Muslim nation in April and held a town-hall meeting there, who had visited the birthplace of Islam, Saudi Arabia and now he has delivered this historic speech in Cairo. This is a leader who came to this potential cauldron of hatred and was unafraid to tell it like it is. The out- of touch autocrats of the region may yet rue the day they allowed him in their midst.    

     

0 Comments
    Picture
    Follow me on Twitter

    ​
    Picture
    fig 2-b My Father and Mother to whom I owe everything

    "Ecce Homo"  ("Behold the Man"), Antonio Ciseri's depiction of Pontius Pilate presenting a scourged Jesus to the people of Jerusalem.

    fig 1-b


    figure 1-a

    F. Goya
    Two men fighting with clubs
    circa 1819-1823

    The Black Paintings Period


    (Fig 2a) The Death of Innocents


    Author

     Ishwar R. Prashad recently retired from over 47 years of teaching.

    He taught Political Science variously at Dawson College, Loyola College, Algoma University College, Sir George Williams University, Concordia University and Vanier College.

    Previously, he taught for nine years in Port Mourant, Guyana.


    He became Principal of Corentyne Comprehensive High School at the tender age of 21. During this time he turned down Scholarship offers to study overseas in England and the U.S.S.R.

    He chose Canada and after graduating from Sir George Williams with a B.A Honours with Distinction, he accepted a Fellowship to complete his graduate work at McMaster University. He completed his first two degrees-Bachelors and Masters- in three years.  

    His last position was as Co-Ordinator of Political Science and Economics at Vanier College and Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Concordia University.

    He is married to the former Juliet Ramcharan (Library Supervisor, McGill University) and together they have three children – Indra R. Prashad, P.Eng. ,McGill (Presently Manager, Ontario Safe Water Drinking Agency), Ishwar R. Prashad Jr., B.A ,McGill (Presently, President, Kismit Gear Inc.) and Rabindra Y. Prashad, (Presently, Artist and Chef).They are the proud Grandparents of eight grandchildren-Miranda, Kamal, Ayesha, Élan, Anĵa , Étienne, Chloé, and Jasmine.

     

     

     





     



    Archives

    July 2020
    May 2020
    October 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    November 1999

    Categories

    All
    A
    Estryed Infrastructure
    F
    Hai
    Ic
    I Will Srike With
    Jr
    O
    Q
    T

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.